Legal Opinion

Timm v. Dewsnup

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1996No. 950073PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSON, Justice:

This matter comes before us for the second time. The first appeal resulted in remand to the trial court for further consideration. Timm v. Dewsnup, 851 P.2d 1178 (Utah 1993) (Timm I). Defendant Aletha Dewsnup 1 now appeals the trial court’s (1) denial of her motion to reconsider summary judgment, (2) denial of her motion to amend her counterclaim, (3) dismissal of her counterclaim, (4) release of the lis pendens on the trust deed property, and (5) denial of her jury demand on her counterclaim. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND

Whil…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In Re Lamar Dewsnup and Aletha Dewsnup, Debtors. Lamar Dewsnup, Aletha Dewsnup v. Louis L. TimmCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. Alta Industries, Ltd. v. HurstUtah Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. U.P.C., Inc. v. R.O.A. General, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  2. Kelly v. Hard Money Funding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2004
  3. Mahana v. Onyx Acceptance Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Jordan Construction, Inc. v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Murdock v. Springville Municipal Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API