Barden v. Stickney.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN by Maggie S. Barden against J. B. Stickney, heard by Judge Walter E. Neal, at October Term, 1901, of the Superior Court of WASHINGTON County. From a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
This case was submitted to the Judge upon a case agreed, and by consent he was to render his judgment out of term, and the losing party should have ten days thereafter in which to appeal, and notice of appeal was waived. Upon receipt of notice of the judgment, and two days before the judgment ivas filed in .the Clerk’s office, the appellant gave written notice of appeal, service of Avhich was accepted by tbe appellee, as appears from tlie transcript of sucb notice and acceptance in tbe record. Tbe appellant filed a justified appeal bond, and bas in all other respects perfected bis appeal and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fleming v. . BardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Fleming v. . BardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Fore v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Atkinson v. Asheville Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Huntley v. . WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1851
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Barden v. Stickney.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Turpin v. County of JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Guy v. First Carolinas Joint Stock Land Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Peacock v. Barnes.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.