Legal Opinion

Peacock v. Barnes.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ActioN by J. W.” Peacock against Ida Barnes and others, heard b j Judge W. B. Councill upon the pleadings at the February Term, 1905, of the Superior Court of Wilson County. From a judgment overruling the demurrer, the defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Claiik, O. J.

Certain lands of Harris Winstead, deceased, were sold to make assets to pay debts by a commissioner appointed by the court in that proceeding. The -net proceeds were applied to the discharge of sundry mortgages upon the land and the surplus was divided between his heirs at law — two daughters — and was invested in real estate. Other real estate of said Winstead was duly partitioned between his said daughters and devisees. At the sale of the land by the commissioner aforesaid to make assets, lot No. 5 was purchased by the plaintiff at the price of $11.10 per acre, the commissioner…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barden v. Stickney.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Queen v. SiskSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Turpin v. County of JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Guy v. First Carolinas Joint Stock Land Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API