Legal Opinion

Conestoga National Bank v. Patterson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1971No. Appeal, No. 13PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

The issues in this appeal have required this Court to reconsider its holding in Cement National Bank v. Department of Banking, 425 Pa. 554, 230 A. 2d 209 (1967). After considerable and careful study, we have concluded that the procedures sanctioned in Cement National Bank do not afford protesting banks in branch application situations the rights of procedural due process which are theirs by virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Article Y, Section 9, of the Pennsylvania Constitution.

This case is an appeal from the order of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Wiley v. WoodsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Parker v. Children's Hospital of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Pennsylvania Coal Mining Ass'n v. Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Hack v. HackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Mercury Trucking, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API