Francisco v. Manhattan Insurance
California Supreme Court
In the Supreme Court of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court,
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sprague, J. :
This is an application for a peremptory mandate to the Judge of the Fifth Judicial District Court, Tuolumne County, directing him, as such Judge, to proceed to the trial and determination of the above entitled cause.
The facts material to an understanding of the points involved in this proceeding, as disclosed by petition and answer, are substantially as follows:
On the 8th of January, 1867, the defendant was, and still is, a corporation duly organized under and by virtue of "the laws of the State of New York, and invested with authority *285to transact a general life…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Page v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Orosco v. GagliardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
- State ex rel. Bayha v. PhilipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Scott v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Kerr v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.