Legal Opinion

Page v. Fowler

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1865PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The defendants appealed from the judgment. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Rhodes, J.

Replevin to recover the possession of a lot of hay, or the value thereof, described as six hundred tons, more or less, of great value, to wit, of the value of six thousand dollars. The hay replevied and delivered to the plaintiff amounted to one hundred and twenty-four tons, of the value of twelve hundred and fifty dollars, and the plaintiff had verdict and judgment for that amount.

The hay was produced during the year 1863, upon a tract of land forming a part of a larger tract, known as the Suscol Rancho, in Solano County. The plaintiff was in possession of the tract,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Halleck v. MixerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Page v. HobbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Hastings v. McGooginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Page v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. People ex rel. Davidson v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Lieberman v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  4. McManus v. O'SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Altschul v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court · 1899

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API