Legal Opinion

Haber v. Bankers Standard Insurance Co

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 31, 2019No. 3:19-cv-00276Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT MURRAY HABER et al., : Plaintiffs, : : v. : CIVIL CASE NUMBER : BANKERS STANDARD INSURANCE CO. : 3:19-cv-276 (VLB) Defendants. : : December 31, 2019 : ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE [DKT. 23]. I. Introduction and Procedural History This action arises out of an insurance coverage dispute. Plaintiffs/Counter- Defendants Murray Haber, Susan, Haber, and the Murray Haber Revocable Trust (collectively, the “Habers”) allege that Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bankers Standard Insurance Company (“Bankers”) wrongfully withheld additional insurance benefits…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. GEOMC Co., Ltd. v. Calmare Therapeutics Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Hartford Life Annuity Insurance v. UnsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. MacKay v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  5. Breen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API