Stott v. Peerless Insurance

Opinion

ROBINSON, J.

The plaintiff in this action for underin-sured motorist benefits, Sarah Stott, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Peerless Insurance Company. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court erred in concluding that she was barred as a matter of law from recovering additional underinsured motorist benefits under her parents’ insurance policy on the basis of *375the policy’s “owned auto” exclusion and antistacking provision and pursuant to the antistacking provision in General Statutes § 38a-336 (d).1 We conclude that the…