Legal Opinion
Detroit Osteopathic Hospital v. City of Southfield
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 1966No. Calendar 1, Docket 50,481PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
Plaintiff filed an application with the city of Southfield to change its residentially zoned land to permit construction of a hospital. Ordinance No 35, which amended Ordinance 18, the city’s zoning ordinance, provides in chapter 4, § 1, for residential use:
“except for one or more of the following specified purposes: * * *
“Churches, private schools, private educational institutions, private hospitals (hut not including institutions for the care of the feeble-minded or insane) after approval by the council of the city of Southfield upon a finding that the use will not be injurious to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Osius v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Civil Service Commission v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Township of Dearborn v. Dearborn Township ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- City of Detroit v. Fort Wayne & Belle Isle Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of Livonia v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Delta Charter Twp. v. DinolfoMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Armstrong v. Ypsilanti Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Rental Property Owners Ass'n v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Pletz v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.