People v. Armstrong
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to the recorder’s court of Detroit to review conviction of respondent under a city ordinance. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This cáse comes from the recorder’s court of the city of Detroit by writ of certiorari. The complaint is made under section 12, chapter 55, Rev. Ordinances Oity of Detroit, as amended August 22, 1885, and charges that at the city of Detroit, on June 18, 1888, within the corporate limits of said city, on Woodward avenue, at the corner of Grand River avenue, the defendant, John Armstrong, then and there unlawfully and willfully did circulate and distribute and give away circulars, hand-bills, and advertising cards, to the evil 'example of all others in like cases offending, and contrary to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re FrazerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Kettering v. City of JacksonvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- City of Clinton v. PhillipsIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by47 opinions
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- People v. LorentzenMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. BullockMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.