In re C.C.J.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
Appellant, N.J., appeals from the trial court’s finding that his two children were neglected under D.C.Code § 16 — 301 (9)(A) (1997 & Supp.2000) (a child “abandoned or abused” by parent).1 Based on the testi*267mony of the children’s examining physician and the lack of parental explanation for observed injuries suggesting sexual abuse, the trial court ruled that the government proved neglect by a preponderance of the evidence. Appellant contends the evidence was insufficient for a finding of neglect. We affirm.
FACTUAL SUMMARY
On September 6, 1996, Ms. Streeta Yar-borough, a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. GaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- In re S.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In re E.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In re Tara H.New York City Family Court · 1985
- In re B.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re A.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In re JE.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re AHDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re CCJDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001