Legal Opinion
In re A.H.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 26, 2004No. 01-FS-764, 01-FS-765, 01-FS-766, 01-FS-767, 01-FS-768PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
D.H. asks us to reverse the judgment of the trial court that she neglected her five small children by allowing them to live in an unsafe and unsanitary home environment. D.H. contends that the evidence of deplorable conditions was insufficient to support the judge’s findings of neglect, *677especially his finding that those conditions were not due to her lack of financial means. We are satisfied, however, that the requirements of our neglect statute were met, and there was no failure of proof. We affirm the judgment on appeal.
I
The five respondents in this case were…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In re S.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In re T.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Majeska v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re K.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re D.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- In re A.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In re P.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Jordan v. JordanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.