Legal Opinion
In Re AH
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 26, 2004No. 01-FS-764, 01-FS-765, 01-FS-766, 01-FS-767, 01-FS-768Published
1Opinion of the Court
842 A.2d 674 (2004)
In Re A.H., De.H., K.H., Shl.H. and S.H., Respondents.
D.H., Appellant.
No. 01-FS-764, 01-FS-765, 01-FS-766, 01-FS-767, 01-FS-768.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued November 20, 2003.
Decided February 26, 2004.
Rhonda R. Brown appointed by the court for appellant.
Sheila Kaplan, Assistant Corporation Counsel, with whom Arabella W. Teal, Interim Corporation Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corporation Counsel at the time the brief was filed, were on the brief, for appellee District of Columbia.
Christopher May, Washington, DC, and Charles J. Szlenker filed…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In re S.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In re T.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Majeska v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.