Legal Opinion

In re B.C.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1990No. Nos. 89-970, 89-971PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal arises from the trial court’s conclusion that two children, W.C. and *1197B.C., were neglected by their father, W.M., as defined by D.C.Code § 16 — 2301(9)(B) (1989 Repl.).1 In August 1987, the District of Columbia alleged that the two children were neglected by their parents and recommended that they be placed in the third party custody of their maternal great-aunt, P.L. After a hearing with the father present, the court concluded that the children were “neglected child[ren]” under § 16-2301(9)(B).2 As a result, the court transferred legal custody of the children to the Department of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re N. M. S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Martin v. TateDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. In re L.E.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In re E.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Appeal of A.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. In re D.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. In re T.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. In re A.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API