Legal Opinion

Long v. Dye

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 18, 1931No. 20397PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. “In a sale of goods, where nothing is said between the parties as to the time of payment of the price, the transaction is understood to be a cash sale. Civil Code (1910), § 4130; 23 R. C. L. 1382 (§ 205) ; 35 Cyc. 264 (§ 3). In such a ease the mere fact that the buyer obtained possession of the goods without payment of the purchase-price does not, as between the vendor and the vendee, operate to pass the title, and trover will lie against him to recover the goods or their equivalent in money.” Morris v. Walker Bros. Co., 29 Ga. App. 476 (2) (116 S. E. 201) ; Chafin v. Cox, 39 Ga. App. 301…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Baldwin's Bank of Penn Yan v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Flannery v. HarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Akers v. Kirke & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  5. Comer v. DufourSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hutto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Graham v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  3. East Point Ford Co. v. LingerfeltCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Graham v. RainesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  5. Cornell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API