Legal Opinion

Comer v. Dufour

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 5, 1895PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Certiorari. Before Judge Falligant. Chatham superior court. June term, 1894.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Chief Justice.

The receiver of the Central Railroad and Banking Company (of which the Central Railroad Bank is a part) brought suit in a justice’s court against J. A. Du-four, upon a cheek for $75, dated at Baltimore, January 9, 1892, upon J. J. Nicholson & Sons, bankers, by S. EL Brosius, payable to the order of A. M. Brosius, and indorsed by A. M. Brosius and by J. A. Dufour; which check had been protested for non-payment. The case was submitted upon an agreement as to facts, and the justice rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff. A writ of certiorari to this judgment was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. People Ex Rel. Port Chester Savings Bank v. CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Anderson v. GillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  4. Smith v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Daniels v. Kyle & BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Noble v. DoughtenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Smith Roofing & Contracting Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Capital Grain & Feed Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of AtlantaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1925
  5. Stapleton v. DismukesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API