Legal Opinion

Graham v. Raines

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1951No. 33301PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorrill, J.

The original petition in this case was substantially in the “Jack Jones” form prescribed by the legislature in the act of 1847 (Ga. L. 1847, p. 203), and if the property sought to be recovered, or for which damages for its conversion are sought, was sufficiently described, the petition was not subject to demurrer, general or special. Crews v. Roberson, 62 Ga. App. 855 (1) (10 S. E. 2d, 114). Furthermore, it is clear that the description of the peanuts involved as being those grown on the farm of Duskin and Raines in the year 1945 and delivered b.y J. W. Duskin, or the Farmers Exchange to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thompson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Miller & Son v. FreemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Waller v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. Council v. NunnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Ellis, McKinnon & Brown v. HoppsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. WootenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Midland Properties Co. v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  3. Winter Bros. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  4. Midland Properties Co. v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API