Legal Opinion

Graham v. Frazier

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 29, 1950No. 32982PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

It is first insisted by the defendants that the petition sets up no cause of action against either of the defendants because the “custodian receipts” are not warehouse receipts within the meaning of Georgia law and that, therefore, title to these peanuts remained in the Farmers’ Exchange Inc. This being so, the defendants urge, the Farmers' Exchange was vested with the title to this property when same was delivered to the defendant Graham for the defendant cotton oil company, and that the title thereto was never in either the Bank of Commerce, the indemnity company or the plaintiff, said…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. CurlingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  2. Hendrick v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Flannery v. HarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Kramer v. SpradlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  5. Burch v. Pedigo & LyonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McCarter v. Bankers Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. The Birkett L. Williams Company and Humphrey Central Chevrolet, Inc. v. James SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  3. Levenson v. WordSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  4. United States v. LaGrange Stockyard, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1967
  5. Graham v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API