Legal Opinion

Windesheim v. Verizon Network Integration Corp.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided July 24, 2002No. CIV. AMD 01-1630PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DAVIS, District Judge.

In this diversity action removed from state court, the plaintiff, Bruce P. Win-desheim (“Windesheim”), seeks damages of more than $670,000 from defendants Verizon Sendees Corporation and Verizon Network Integration Corporation. Plaintiff alleges that defendants and/or defendants’ predecessors-in-interest failed to pay the full amount of a bonus to which he was entitled in connection with his employment as a systems engineer. Specifically, Windesheim alleges claims for breach of contract, violation of the Maryland Wage Payment and Collection Act, unjust…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. N. Brown FELTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAVES-HUMPHREYS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mazer v. Safeway, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
  2. In Re National Energy & Gas Transmission, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2006
  3. Lanasa v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LPDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
  4. Martignetti v. International Business Machines CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  5. Moon v. Veritas Technologies LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API