Russell Box Co. v. Grant Paper Box Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOODBURY, Circuit Judge.
The order from which the instant appeal was taken is certainly interlocutory. The primary question, therefore, and as we see it the only one presented, is whether the order is nevertheless appealable under either subparagraph (1) or (4) of § 1292 of Title 28 United States Code Annotated; the other subparagraphs of that section being clearly inapplicable.
The facts are fully stated in the memorandum opinion of the court below reported in 82 U.S.P.Q. 5. For present purposes they can be briefly summarized.
On December 18, 1943, while the instant action for patent…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Defense Supplies Corp. v. Lawrence Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Bowles v. WilkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Grant Paper Box Co. v. Russell Box Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
- Grant Paper Box Co. v. Russell Box Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Robert Bosch, Llc v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- SCHLEGEL MANUFACTURING CO. v. King Aluminum Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1974
- Robert Bosch, Llc v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Russell Box Co. v. Grant Paper Box Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.