Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Pulse Electronics, Inc. and Pulse Electronics Corporation (together, “Pulse”) appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada awarding Halo Electronics, Inc. (“Halo”) prejudgment interest. See Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse Elecs., Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00331-APG-PAL, slip op. (D. Nev. Apr. 6, 2016) (Joint Appendix “J.A.” 1-2). Because we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss.
Background
Halo owns U.S. Patents 5,656,985, 6,297,720, and 6,344,785 (collectively, the “Halo patents”). In 2007, Halo sued Pulse for patent infringement. Pulse denied…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Parkervision, Inc. v. Qualcomm IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
- Mary and Sherry Davis, Kevin Laughlin, David and Denise Kamm v. City of Kearney, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
- Parkervision, Inc. v. Qualcomm IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
- Stone Group Holdings LLC v. Todd EllisonColorado Court of Appeals · 2024