Legal Opinion
Dept. of Community Aff. v. Atrium Pal.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 14, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
244 N.J. Super. 329 (1990)
582 A.2d 821
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, DIVISION OF HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT,
v.
THE ATRIUM PALACE SYNDICATE, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted October 17, 1990.
Decided November 14, 1990.
Before Judges KING, LONG and R.S. COHEN.
Lasser, Hochman, Marcus, Guryan and Kuskin, attorneys for appellant (Bruce H. Snyder on the brief).
Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney for respondent (Michael R. Clancy, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel, Eliaser Chaparro, Deputy Attorney General, on the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hodes v. DunskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Caporale v. RubineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
- Bernstein v. KohnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
- Hodes v. DunskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
3Cited by6 opinions
- Coastal Group v. PLANNED REAL EST.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Cybul v. Atrium Palace SyndicateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Department of Community Affairs v. Atrium Palace SyndicateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Department of Community Affairs v. Atrium Palace SyndicateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Belletsky v. Estate of Davino, No. Cv-93 0114168 S (Mar. 4, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.