Legal Opinion

Hodes v. Dunsky

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 10, 1949PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] By assignment, the plaintiff stands as the purchaser in a contract for the sale of real estate. When the vendors, the defendants, failed to convey the land to her, she sued in the County Court for the return of $1,750 paid on account of the purchase price. The defendants moved for a summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff had not tendered performance on her part; that she had breached the contract, and that "there is no issue of fact requiring a trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Earlin v. MorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  2. Mitchell v. Wrightstown Community Apartments, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  3. Kadow v. CroninSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  4. Bernstein v. KohnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
  5. Shinn v. RobertsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1845

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Templeton v. ScudderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. Stamato v. AgamieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  4. Templeton v. Glen RockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  5. Guillory Corporation v. Dussin Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API