Hodes v. Dunsky
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] By assignment, the plaintiff stands as the purchaser in a contract for the sale of real estate. When the vendors, the defendants, failed to convey the land to her, she sued in the County Court for the return of $1,750 paid on account of the purchase price. The defendants moved for a summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff had not tendered performance on her part; that she had breached the contract, and that "there is no issue of fact requiring a trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Earlin v. MorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Mitchell v. Wrightstown Community Apartments, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Kadow v. CroninSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
- Bernstein v. KohnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
- Shinn v. RobertsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1845
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Templeton v. ScudderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Stamato v. AgamieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Templeton v. Glen RockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Guillory Corporation v. Dussin Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.