Legal Opinion

Caporale v. Rubine

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 18, 1918PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kalisch, J.

The legal question presented on this appeal is whether the plaintiff made out a case legally sufficient to, warrant its submission, by the trial judge, to a jury for its decision.

The plaintiff below was permitted to recover a verdict for $925' and costs against the defendant below, as damages, for an alleged breach of contract, and to enter judgment on the verdict, from Avhieh judgment the defendant appeals.

The legal question as to the sufficiency of the proof is raised by a motion for a nonsuit, which was denied, and by a motion to direct a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bigler v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bertrand v. JonesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. Penthouse International, Ltd. v. Dominion Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  3. Miller v. Schwinn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  4. Dept. of Community Aff. v. Atrium Pal.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  5. Penthouse International, Ltd., and Boardwalk Properties, Inc., Plaintiffs v. Dominion Federal Savings & Loan Association, and Melrod, Redman & Gartlan, P.C., Dominion Federal Savings & Loan Association, Third-Party v. Queen City Savings & Loan Association, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API