Legal Opinion
Hodes v. Dunsky
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 10, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
15 N.J. Super. 27 (1951)
83 A.2d 17
ANN HODES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JOSEPH DUNSKY AND IRMA DUNSKY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued July 30, 1951.
Decided August 10, 1951.
Before Judges JAYNE, WM. J. BRENNAN, JR., and VANDERWART.
Mr. Jerome Lieb argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Harkavy and Lieb, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., J.A.D.
Following this court's reversal of a summary judgment in defendants' favor, Hodes v. Dunsky, 5 N.J. Super. 333 (App. Div. 1949), plaintiff obtained a judgment in Essex…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Paradiso v. MazejySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Hodes v. DunskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Ingling v. Public Service Elec. & Gas Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Norton v. MillerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
- Bernstein v. KohnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moore v. Pub. Service Coordinated TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- In Re McLean Industries, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Gindin v. BaronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Dept. of Community Aff. v. Atrium Pal.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990