Legal Opinion

Ramesh v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 1984No. A14-83-856-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

J. CURTISS BROWN, Chief Justice.

This is an action for broker’s commissions by Gerald A. Johnson (Johnson or appellee) against A. Behooz Ramesh (Ram-esh or appellant), a buyer of real estate. The trial court entered judgment for $28,-000 in favor of appellee Johnson (the broker). Ramesh asserts two points of error on appeal, both of which challenge the application by the trial judge of the law of “procuring cause” to the facts of the case. We affirm.

The facts are largely undisputed. In January of 1979, Ramesh asked appellee Johnson to find an apartment complex in Houston with which…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. GunterTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Knight v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Stitt v. Royal Park Fashions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Volkmann v. WorthamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  5. Toland v. KaliffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Frady v. MayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Bychowski v. ERA Tempo Realty, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. Centex Corp. v. DaltonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. 839 E. 19th Street, L.P. v. Scott Friedson D/B/A National Income Property, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  5. 839 E. 19th Street, L.P. v. Scott Friedson D/B/A National Income Property, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API