839 E. 19th Street, L.P. v. Scott Friedson D/B/A National Income Property, LLC
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Dissent
MARTHA HILL JAMISON, Justice, '
dissenting.
Because I find that the second offer brokered by Friedson on May 30, 2006, also called 839 E. 19th Street’s attention to the Mesa Ridge property, and because that date falls within the agreement period, I respectfully disagree that paragraph 11B of the buyer’s representation agreement does not apply. Accordingly, I would overrule 839 E. 19th Street’s first and second issues. I also would overrule 839 E. 19th Street’s third and fourth issues and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
In its first issue, 839 E. 19th Street contends that the agreement…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Centex Corp. v. DaltonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Solar Applications Engineering, Inc. v. T.A. Operating Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2010
- Belmont Constructors, Inc. v. Lyondell Petrochemical Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
- Ramesh v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.