Legal Opinion

Stitt v. Royal Park Fashions, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 4, 1977No. 19100PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Justice.

Appellants, J. E. Stitt and Henry S. Miller Company, appeal from an order granting appellees’, Royal Park Fashions, Inc., and Sears, Roebuck & Company, motion for summary judgment and denying appellants’ motion for summary judgment. Appellants seek real estate commissions as provided in a sublease agreement entered into by appellants, appellees, and Trinity Company, the owner of the leased premises. They appeal on the ground that the trial court erred as a matter of law in denying their motion for summary judgment because the phrase “as collected from tenant” in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. City of Pinehurst v. Spooner Addition Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Myers v. Gulf Coast Minerals Management Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Republic National Bank of Dallas v. National Bankers Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Don Drum Real Estate Company v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hudson v. WakefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Economy Forms Corp. v. WILLIAMS BROS. CONST. CO. INC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Morris v. Jordan Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Kosberg v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Bradshaw v. Lower Colorado River AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API