Legal Opinion

Centex Corp. v. Dalton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1992No. D-1244PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

840 S.W.2d 952 (1992)

CENTEX CORPORATION, Petitioner,

v.

John DALTON, Respondent.

No. D-1244.

Supreme Court of Texas.

November 4, 1992.

Rehearing Overruled December 16, 1992.

Jerry P. Jones, Luke Ashley, Michael R. Berry, Dallas, for petitioner.

Bernard William Fischman, San Antonio, for respondent.

OPINION

GAMMAGE, Justice.

We consider whether the court of appeals erred by holding that Centex Corporation's (Centex) contract with John Dalton was not invalidated by a governmental regulation. In district court, Dalton filed suit against Centex seeking to recover liquidated damages for alleged breach of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Hudson v. WakefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hohenberg Bros. Co. v. George E. Gibbons & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Vortt Exploration Co., Inc. v. Chevron USA, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joseph Hankins and Theresa Hankins v. Mark C. Burnett and B.J. Burnett, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API