Legal Opinion

Juhasz v. Costanzo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 2001No. Case No. 99-C.A.-294PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Waite, Judge.

This timely appeal arises from a judgment entry of the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas denying appellant’s motion for a stay of proceedings pending arbitration. Appellant argues that the parties signed an agreement to arbitrate their dispute over appellees’ attorney fees, and that appellees’ attempts to withdraw from arbitration were not permitted under R.C. 2711.01. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Appellees John B. Juhasz (“Juhasz”) and Alan J. Matavich (“Matavich”) are licensed Ohio attorneys who…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Episcopal Retirement Homes, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Industrial RelationsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Schaefer v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Nilavar v. OsbornOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Harsco Corp. v. Crane Carrier Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Raasch v. NCR Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
  2. N. Side Bank & Trust Co. v. Trinity Aviation, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Spectrum Benefit Options, Inc. v. Medical MutualOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Clay v. Schriver Allison Courtley Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Fenix Enterprises, Inc. v. M & M Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API