Harsco Corp. v. Crane Carrier Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Hadley, Judge.
Defendant-appellant Crane Carrier Company (“Crane”) appeals the judgment of the Union County Common Pleas Court denying Crane’s motion for stay of proceedings and referral to arbitration. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the decision of the trial court and refer this matter to arbitration as provided for in the Manufacturing License Agreement entered into between Crane and plaintiff-appellee Harsco Corporation (“Harsco”).
Crane and Harsco entered into a Manufacturing License Agreement on May 11, 1993. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Crane manufactured and sold…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Brumm v. McDonald & Co. Securities, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- La Nacional Platanera v. North American Fruit & Steamship Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- Mills v. Jaguar-ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Eagle v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Griffith v. LintonOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Vanyo v. Clear Channel WorldwideOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Morris v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Seyfried v. O'BrienOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.