Legal Opinion
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Condict
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided May 1, 1976No. Civ. A. J74-300(N)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
NIXON, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna), a Connecticut corporation qualified to do and doing business in the state of Mississippi with its principal place of business in the state of Connecticut, filed this diversity subrogation action against Louis L. Condict, a resident citizen of the state of Tennessee, seeking to recover, as an alleged uninsured motorist, an amount in excess of $10,000.00, paid by Aetna to its insureds by virtue of uninsured motorist and medical pay provisions of its policy. This cause of action arose as a result of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- DeFord v. National Life & Accident Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1945
- Belk v. RosamondMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
- Planters Wholesale Grocery v. KincadeMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
- Burch v. Commonwealth County Mutual Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1970
- United States v. PatryasSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- GenCorp, Inc. v. American International UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Mrs. Dennis Hauser v. Krupp Steel Producers, Inc., D/B/A Universal Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Ramirez v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.