Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Ramcke
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 21, 1953PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The plaintiff sought to enjoin the defendants from denying to him and his tenants the use of a roadway to the seashore. He also claimed damages because they had erected a fence across the roadway. The court rendered judgment for the defendants and the plaintiff has appealed.
The pertinent facts in the finding, which is not subject to correction, are as follows: The plaintiff owns three separate parcels of land lying near the shore of Long Island Sound in Westbrook. The land is divided into lots with cottages erected upon them. The plaintiff purchased the first parcel in April, 1938, the second…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jaconski v. AMF, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Whitton v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Aksomitas v. South End Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Missionary Society v. CoutuSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Johnson v. Town of WatertownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gioielli v. Mallard Cove Condominium Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Gregory's, Inc. v. BaltimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- South Norwalk Lodge, No. 709 v. Palco Hats, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Elmer v. RodgersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
- Hackert v. EdwardsConnecticut Superior Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.