Legal Opinion

McAuliffe v. Kane

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 2, 1942No. Civ. 12056PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

J. —This appeal involves the question of whether petitioner, as justice of the peace of the Third Judicial Township of San Mateo County, is entitled to the increase in salary provided for by a county ordinance enacted more than two years after petitioner’s term of office began. The trial court held that he was, and the controller of the county has appealed.

The facts are not disputed, and for all the purposes of the appeal may be stated as follows: San Mateo County is governed by a freeholders’ charter, adopted pursuant to section 7% of article XI of the state Constitution, which provides,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. MathewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Puterbaugh v. WadhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. County of San Luis Obispo v. FeltsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Kilroy v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Williams v. GareyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Markman v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Woollomes v. WoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Martin v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API