Williams v. Garey
California Court of Appeal
•The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Phil D. Swing, District Attorney, for Auditor, Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Prior to the year 1909 the county of Imperial was classified by the legislature as a county of the thirty-sixth class. By section 4265 of the Political Code the salaries of the various county officers for such counties were then fixed. The introductory portion of the section referred to reads as follows: “In counties of thirty-sixth class, the county officers shall receive as compensation for the services required of them by law, or by virtue of their office, the following salar ries.” By subdivision 3 of said section it was provided, that the county recorder should receive the sum.of $3,000…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. MathewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Kirkwood v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Chapin v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Applestill v. GaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Agard v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by12 opinions
- Busch v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Kilroy v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Regan v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- McAuliffe v. KaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Board of Commissioners v. StraubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.