Martin v. Henderson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
For a number of years, Andrew W. Martin was a traffic sergeant and George H. Redwine a traffic officer of the State Highway Patrol. They worked in excess of regular hours of duty without receiving equivalent time off. After the termination of their employment, Martin and Redwine'each filed a petition to compel the appropriate state official to approve his claim for overtime. The appeal is from a judgment requiring approval and payment of the claims.
The facts are undisputed. During the entire period of service, the monthly salary of each petitioner was fully paid. Martin worked about 500 hours…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Dillon v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Doughterty v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Pohle v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Miller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Longshore v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Retired Employees Ass'n of Orange County, Inc. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Walker v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.