Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Peck

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1936No. 5772PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLAND, Justice.

This suit was brought to establish plaintiff’s claim to an easement for a right of way over the west 12 feet of defen dants’ land, for injunctive relief and for damages. Defendants by answer denied the existence of the easement, set up a counterclaim asserting ownership of the land described free from any easement, and prayed for injunctive relief and for damages. The Johnsons and the Bucks reside on adjoining lots. Both lots were originally owned by the Baird Realty Investment Company. In October of 1923 the company conveyed its title by warranty deed to the Johnson lot,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morris v. BluntUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Beardslee v. New Berlin Light & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Johnson Et Ux. v. BrinkerhoffUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Rollo v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Stone v. StoneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ault v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hartman v. PotterUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Petersen v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Ballenger v. TillmanMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Simpson v. Kistler Investment Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API