Legal Opinion

United States v. $40,000.00 in United States Currency

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided February 8, 2019No. 5:17-CV-398-FLPublished

1Opinion of the Court

LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, United States District Judge

This matter comes before the court on claimant Jason Do's ("claimant") motion for summary judgment (DE 20). The motion has been fully briefed, and in this posture the issues presented are ripe for ruling. For the reasons noted, the motion is denied.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The government initiated these civil forfeiture actions on August 3, 2017, as to claimant, and September 21, 2017, as to Son Ba Do in companion case, by filing the same complaint in each case for forfeiture in rem against $ 40,000.00 in U.S. currency to enforce 18 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API