Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Harper

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 8, 1946No. 36,601PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

This case creates the necessity for consideration of the legal effect of a dormant judgment and the significance of ancillary proceedings occurring prior to the dormancy of the judgment. It does not concern revivor proceedings.

On January 6, 1941, the bank obtained a judgment against Harper for $2,440.09 and costs. No execution was issued on the judgment until January 29, 1946. On such date an execution was issued and a motion to quash the execution was filed thereafter predicated upon the contention that the judgment was dormant. The trial…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Harrison v. OrrTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  2. United States v. NourseSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  3. Norton v. ReardonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Capital Bank v. HuntoonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  5. Halsey v. Van VlietSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clark v. GlazerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
  2. Chandler-Frates & Reitz v. KostichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. DeKalb Swine Breeders, Inc. v. Woolwine Supply Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  4. Dallas v. DallasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. In Re RuckUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API