Legal Opinion
Clark v. Glazer
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided April 25, 1980No. 50,792PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foth, C.J.:
The issue in this case is whether equitable estoppel will prevent a judgment from becoming dormant and eventually barred under K.S.A. 60-2403. We hold it will not.
The judgment in this case was one for alimony, entered in the parties’ divorce action on June 27, 1968. The pertinent provision was:
“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the defendant shall pay the plaintiff as and for alimony the sum of Four Hundred Fifty ($450.00) Dollars per month until her death or remarriage; provided, however, that so long as his income, exclusive of car allowance, is Seven Hundred.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smalley v. BowlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Thomos v. MurraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Reaves & Co. v. J. A. Long & BrotherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
- Bourman v. BourmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Steinbach v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. v. Americold Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Vanover v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Long v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
- DeKalb Swine Breeders, Inc. v. Woolwine Supply Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Mark v. MarkColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.