Legal Opinion

DeKalb Swine Breeders, Inc. v. Woolwine Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 15, 1991No. 65,726PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Abbott, J.:

This is an appeal by DeKalb Swine Breeders, Inc., from the trial court’s order denying its motion to revive a judgment and dismissing its garnishment action. DeKalb appeals, contending that a timely garnishment action was still pending when the trial court dismissed the action and that the motion to revive was timely filed.

DeKalb sued Denny Whitman, d/b/a Whitman Trucking Company, Canal Insurance Company (Canal) (one of Whitman’s insurers), and others for negligence in a motor vehicle accident. DeKalb did not name Hartford Fire Insurance…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Marshall v. MatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Johnson Brothers Wholesale Liquor Co. v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Treat v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Long v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Clark v. GlazerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. v. Americold Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. Morrissey v. MorrisseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. St. Joseph Development Corp. v. SequenziaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
  4. In re GretchenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1995
  5. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. v. Americold Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API