DeKalb Swine Breeders, Inc. v. Woolwine Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Abbott, J.:
This is an appeal by DeKalb Swine Breeders, Inc., from the trial court’s order denying its motion to revive a judgment and dismissing its garnishment action. DeKalb appeals, contending that a timely garnishment action was still pending when the trial court dismissed the action and that the motion to revive was timely filed.
DeKalb sued Denny Whitman, d/b/a Whitman Trucking Company, Canal Insurance Company (Canal) (one of Whitman’s insurers), and others for negligence in a motor vehicle accident. DeKalb did not name Hartford Fire Insurance…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Marshall v. MatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Johnson Brothers Wholesale Liquor Co. v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Treat v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Long v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Clark v. GlazerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. v. Americold Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Morrissey v. MorrisseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- St. Joseph Development Corp. v. SequenziaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
- In re GretchenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1995
- Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. v. Americold Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.