North Carolina Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Coleman
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
Clauses, such as contained in the suit policy, stipulating for the soundness of health of insured as condition precedent to the operation of the policy, have been construed to be effective as warranties and enforceable as such if, at the time of the issuance and delivery of the contract, the subject was in fact afflicted with a disease or ailment which increased the risk of loss. Vredenburgh v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co., 246 Ala. 251, 20 So.2d 207; National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Collins, 244 Ala. 182, 12 So.2d 353; Life Ins. Co. of Virginia v. Newell, 223 Ala. 401,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Life Ins. Co. of Virginia v. NewellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Vinson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Vredenburgh v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Ex Parte Southern Amiesite Asphalt Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
3Cited by5 opinions
- Margie C. Barnes v. Atlantic & Pacific Life Insurance Company of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Ex Parte ThaggardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- National Security Insurance Co. of Elba v. TellisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
- Brush v. RountreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Bruner v. EubanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948