Legal Opinion

Vinson v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 24, 1945No. 8 Div. 310PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, ■ Justice.

A reversal was declared by the Court of Appeals because of the two errors hereinafter noted and the petition here is for writ of certiorari to review that decision.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals discloses that the solicitor was permitted to cross-examine the character witnesses of the defendant as follows: “Say he (defendant) was running a place, — we will say down here in the basement of the court house selling whiskey in violation of the law where he was selling any kind of whiskey, would you say his character was good ?”

The law is correctly stated in the opinion of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Mullins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Jones v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Helms v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Grissom v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Singley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API