Vinson v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, ■ Justice.
A reversal was declared by the Court of Appeals because of the two errors hereinafter noted and the petition here is for writ of certiorari to review that decision.
The opinion of the Court of Appeals discloses that the solicitor was permitted to cross-examine the character witnesses of the defendant as follows: “Say he (defendant) was running a place, — we will say down here in the basement of the court house selling whiskey in violation of the law where he was selling any kind of whiskey, would you say his character was good ?”
The law is correctly stated in the opinion of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Mullins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
- Jones v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
3Cited by15 opinions
- Baldwin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Helms v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Grissom v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
- Singley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.