F. Schumacher & Co. v. Silver Wallpaper & Paint Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BRODY, District Judge.
In considering plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction I must first determine whether certain statements of the defendant violate Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act on the basis of using misleading misrepresentations of fact likely to cause confusion about defendant’s affiliation with plaintiff.
Next I must decide whether a marketing policy adopted by plaintiff constitutes an enforceable term in its contract with third parties such that by inducing the third parties to disregard the policy defendant tortiously interferes with a contract.
Finally, I must…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Opticians Ass'n of America v. Independent Opticians of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin & Creskoff v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reilly Foam Corp. v. Rubbermaid Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Matrix Essentials, Inc. v. Cosmetic Gallery, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Villanova University v. Villanova Alumni Educational Foundation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Standard Process, Inc. v. Total Health Discount, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2008
- Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Mountain Speedway, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2001