Legal Opinion
Aerojet-General Corp. v. Aero-Jet Products Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 8, 1963No. Civ. A. No. C 62-899PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALBFLEISCH, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Aerojet-General Corporation, has brought this action, based upon an alleged violation of its trademark, against Aero-Jet Products Corporation and Plasti-Kote, Inc. Defendants have filed a counterclaim charging a violation of the Sherman Act by the plaintiff and the General Tire and Rubber Company, of which the plaintiff is a wholly-owned subsidiary. And, among other defenses to the plaintiff’s petition, the defendants have raised the contention that the plaintiff. is barred from recovery because of the equitable doctrine of unclean hands. This defense is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- White Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Package Closure Corporation v. Sealright Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reed v. StreibWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Bonda's Veevoederfabriek, Provimi, B v. v. Provimi, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1977
- Independence Tube Corp. v. Copperweld Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
- Wedding v. Tallant Transfer Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1963
- Lizama v. RiosDistrict Court, Northern Mariana Islands · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.