Legal Opinion
Wedding v. Tallant Transfer Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 16, 1963No. Civ. A. No. C 62-289PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALBFLEISCH, District Judge.
This is a personal injury action. There are, at the present time, five different disputes between the plaintiff and the defendant concerning discovery. The record shows that although the first motion was at issue on January 19, 1963, there was an agreement to postpone the ruling until the pretrial of the ease in March. The record also shows that none of these motions were submitted to a court for determination until September 4, 1963. Each motion will be considered separately.
I. Defendant’s Motion of January 2, 1963, to Require Further Answers to Interrogatories.
Int…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Aktiebolaget Vargos v. ClarkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949
- Harvey v. LevineDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1960
- Lantz v. New York Central RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1963
- United States v. SelbyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McClain v. Mack Trucks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Greene v. RaymondDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1966
- U. S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Metropolitan Museum of ArtDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978