Legal Opinion
Independence Tube Corp. v. Copperweld Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 2, 1977No. 76 C 4201PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILL, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Independence Tube Corporation (Independence) brings this action against *464Copperweld Corporation (Copperweld), Regal Tube Company (Regal) and The Yoder Company (Yoder) claiming, pursuant to the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, et seq., combinations and conspiracies by defendants to foreclose competition by the plaintiff and attempts to monopolize and combinations and conspiracies to monopolize the structural steel tubing market. Jurisdiction over the antitrust claims is founded on the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 15 and 26 and 28 U.S.C. § 1337.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Baker v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Great Lakes Rubber Corporation v. Herbert Cooper Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- L'Aiglon Apparel, Inc. v. Lana Lobell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- United Artists Corporation v. Masterpiece Productions, Inc., and Robert S. Benjamin, Arthur B. Krim, Seymour M. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Elizabeth Forsling Harris v. Gloria Steinem, Patricia Carbine and Ms. Magazine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Xerox Corp. v. SCM Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Itofca, Incorporated v. David HellhakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Appletree v. City of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1983
- Independent Liberty Life Insurance v. Fiduciary & General Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.