Legal Opinion

Udell Savings Bank v. Hollingsworth

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 26, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe G-rafe, J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover as a holder in due course on a promissory note reading as follows:

August 8, 1919. $750!

Six months after date I promise to pay to the order of myself seven hundred fifty. dollars for value received, with interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum. Due February 8,1920. W. S. Hollingsworth. [Indorsed] W. S. Hollingsworth.

This appeal involves the correctness of the ruling of the trial court in directing a verdict for the defendant. In view of the two propositions argued in this court, there is little occasion to recite the facts and circumstances surrounding the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Tilt v. KelseySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Matter of Union E.R.R. Co. of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. State ex rel. Atkinson v. McDonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Lutton v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Havner v. Associated Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  2. Newhall Savings Bank v. BuckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  3. State Ex Rel. Havner v. Associated Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. Andrew v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API