Legal Opinion

Newhall Savings Bank v. Buck

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 1, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVeRmilioN, J.

The defendant and appellee Happel was, at the time of the transaction out of which this controversy arose, a dealer in farm machinery at Newhall. Under an arrangement which it is not necessary to set out or discuss in detail, the defendant and appellee Bommann, residing at Garrison, on March 30, 1920, sold to the defendant and appellant, Buck, a tractor belonging to Happel, taking in payment the note in suit. The note is for $1,525, is payable to the order of Rommann, is due June 1, 1920, and contains a provision to the effect that, in case of a suit, any justice of the peace may have…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baker v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Farmers Savings Bank v. NeelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  3. Smith v. First Nat. Bank of Cadiz, OhioSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Richardson v. CheshireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. Baumgartner v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. MinklerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Perry National Bank v. EngnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  3. Engelke v. DragerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Peterson v. Central National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API