Legal Opinion
Ramstad v. Lear Siegler Diversified Holdings Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 1, 1993No. Civil 4-91-567PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial. Based on a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated below, the court denies plaintiffs’ motion.
BACKGROUND
On June 10,1988, Grant Ramstad’s (“Ramstad”) foot was injured in a grain auger accident which occurred at plaintiffs’ farm near Hawley, Minnesota. Ramstad was using the auger to transport barley from a grain bin to a truck. Ramstad placed his foot on the auger near the intake to boost himself over the auger. Ramstad’s foot slipped between the bars covering…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Esparza v. Skyreach Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Holowaty v. McDonald's, Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Block v. Toyota Motor Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Great N. Ins. Co. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- McDaniel v. Bieffe USA, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.